Abyssinia Vanterpool of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC

DID ABYSSINIA VANTERPOOL CAUSE YOU INVESTMENT LOSSES? Abyssinia Vanterpool Of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Has A Customer Complaint For Alleged Broker Misconduct Who is Abyssinia Vanterpool of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC? Abyssinia Vanterpool (CRD #6362832) who is currently registered with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and located in New York, New York is is a subject of one of our many securities industry sales practice abuse investigations. Abyssinia Vanterpool Customer Complaint Abyssinia Vanterpool has been the subject of at least one customer complaint that we know about, which was filed in the last year to recover investment losses. The allegations made in the FINRA reported customer complaint for investment losses were allegations that the risk associated with an investment in a municipal income fund is not adequately disclosed.Abyssinia Vanterpool’s customer complaint was denied and, to date, the customer has not taken any further action. Abyssinia Vanterpool Red Flags & Your Rights As An Investor Of course, Abyssinia Vanterpool did not admit to any of the allegations. But regardless of whether an arbitration award was entered, a settlement occurred, or the customer complaint is still pending, the allegations made by customers are red flags which should put all current and former customers of Abyssinia Vanterpool at Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC on alert to review carefully the activity and performance of their accounts and question whether Abyssinia Vanterpool has engaged in any stockbroker misconduct that may have caused them investment losses. The large number of customer complaints at Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC also raises questions about the brokerage firm’s supervisory practices. If these red flags raise questions, call us and we will inform you of your rights as an investor. File A Claim To Recover Your Investment Losses At Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Due To Abyssinia Vanterpool If you have questions about Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and/or Abyssinia Vanterpool and the management or performance of your accounts, please contact Attorney Pearce for a free initial consultation via email or Toll Free at 1-800-732-2889.

Continue Reading

Francis Aurino of Morgan Stanley

DID FRANCIS JAMES AURINO CAUSE YOU INVESTMENT LOSSES? Francis Aurino of Morgan Stanley Has 4 Customer Complaints for Alleged Broker Misconduct Who is Francis Aurino of Morgan Stanley? Francis Aurino (CRD #1754375) who is currently registered with Morgan Stanley and located in Beverly Hills, California is a subject of one of our many securities industry sales practice abuse investigations. Francis Aurino Customer Complaints Francis Aurino has been the subject of 4 customer complaints that we know about. There is currently one pending customer complaint filed against Morgan Stanley for investment losses caused by Francis Aurino’s alleged misconduct. Three of Francis Aurino’s customer’s complaints were denied and the customers did not take any further action. Allegations Against Francis Aurino A sample of the allegations made in the FINRA reported arbitration claim settlements and/or pending complaints for investment losses are as follows: The claimant alleges, inter alia, that Francis Aurino misrepresented securities that were not suitable for her investment portfolio. Claimants allege, inter alia, unsuitability with respect to investments by Francis Aurino. The client alleged bonds were unsuitable and misrepresented by Francis Aurino. Damages unspecified. The client alleged that Francis Aurino promised to take action in the account to minimize losses during a lengthy market downturn but did not do so. Francis Aurino Red Flags & Your Rights as An Investor Of course, Francis Aurino did not admit to any of the allegations. But regardless of whether an arbitration award was entered, a settlement occurred, or the customer complaint is still pending, the allegations made by customers are red flags that should put all current and former customers of Francis Aurino at Morgan Stanley on alert to review carefully the activity and performance of their accounts and question whether Francis Aurino has engaged in any stockbroker misconduct that may have caused them investment losses. A large number of customer complaints at Morgan Stanley also raises questions about the brokerage firms’ supervisory practices. If these red flags raise questions, call us and we will inform you of your rights as an investor. File A Claim to Recover Your Investment Losses at Morgan Stanley Due to Francis Aurino If you have questions about Morgan Stanley and/or Francis Aurino and the management or performance of your accounts, please contact Attorney Pearce for a free initial consultation via email or Toll Free at 1-800-732-2889.

Continue Reading

Andrew Nardella of First Allied Securities

DID ANDREW PAUL NARDELLA CAUSE YOU INVESTMENT LOSSES? Andrew Paul Nardella formerly with First Allied Securities Has 3 Customer Complaints for Alleged Broker Misconduct Who is Andrew P. Nardella formerly with First Allied Securities? Andrew Nardella (CRD #1799354) who was formerly registered with First Allied Securities and located in Cazenovia, NY is a subject of one of our many securities industry sales practice abuse investigations. Prior to First Allied Securities, Andrew Nardella was associated with 1st Discount Brokerage and 1 other investment advisory and brokerage firm with a history of customer complaints and securities industry regulatory problems. First Allied Securities Broker Misconduct In his/her career, Andrew Nardella has been the subject of 3 customer complaints that we know about, one of those complaints was filed in the last two years to recover investment losses. One of Andrew Nardella’s 3 customer complaints was settled in favor of investors. 2 of the customer’s complaints were denied and the customers did not take any further action. Allegations Against Andrew Nardella A sample of the allegations made in the FINRA reported arbitration claim settlements and pending complaints for investment losses are as follows: The client alleges misrepresentation in REIT sale in 2014. The client’s attorney-in-fact alleges unauthorized trading in May 2013. The customer claims that his instructions to place stop-loss orders were not placed properly. Andrew Nardella Red Flags & Your Rights as An Investor Of course, Andrew Nardella did not admit to any of the allegations. But regardless of whether an arbitration award was entered, a settlement occurred, or the customer complaint is still pending, the allegations made by customers are red flags that should put all current and former customers of Andrew Nardella at First Allied Securities on alert to review carefully the activity and performance of their accounts and question whether Andrew Nardella has engaged in any stockbroker misconduct that may have caused them investment losses. There have been a large number of customer complaints at First Allied Securitieswhich also raises questions about its supervisory practices. If these red flags raise questions, call us and we will inform you of your rights as an investor. File A Claim to Recover Your Investment Losses at First Allied Securities If you have questions about First Allied Securities and/or Andrew Nardella and the management or performance of your accounts, please contact Attorney Pearce for a free initial consultation via email or Toll Free at 1-800-732-2889.

Continue Reading

Daniel Brunette of First Allied Securities, Inc.

DID DANIEL EDWARD BRUNETTE CAUSE YOU INVESTMENT LOSSES? Daniel Edward Brunette with First Allied Securities, Inc. Has 16 Customer Complaints For Alleged Broker Misconduct, 3 Complaints In the Past Year Who is Daniel E. Brunette with First Allied Securities, Inc.? Daniel Brunette (CRD #813924) who is currently registered with First Allied Securities, Inc. and located in Indianapolis, Indiana is a subject of one of our many securities industry sales practice abuse investigations. Prior to First Allied Securities, Inc., Daniel Brunette was associated with 7 other investment advisory and brokerage firms with a history of customer complaints and securities industry regulatory problems. Daniel Brunette has had his own share of regulatory problems. While he was employed with Northwestern Mutual investment Services, LLC, it was alleged that he misrepresented variable life insurance policies in the NASD censured, suspended and fined him for that alleged misconduct. Thereafter, he failed to notify the states of Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Illinois of the any as the action and he was subject to a variety of sanctions, including, revocation of his licenses, withdrawals of his registration, probation, heightened supervision, censures, cease-and-desist orders, and/or fines. First Allied Securities, Inc. And Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC Broker Misconduct In his career, Daniel Brunette has been the subject of 16 customer complaints that we know about, 3 of those complaints were filed in the last year to recover investment losses. Nine of Daniel Brunette’s 16 customer complaints were settled in favor of investors. There is currently one pending customer complaint filed against Daniel Brunette’s current employer First Allied Securities, Inc. for investment losses caused by his alleged misconduct. Allegations Against Daniel Brunette   A sample of the allegations made in the FINRA reported customer complaints, arbitration claims and settlements and pending complaints for investment losses are as follows: Multiple customers in separate arbitrations and written complaints alleged misrepresentation of variable life insurance policy. Complainant alleged that Daniel Brunette is misleading sales materials in misrepresenting a variable life insurance policy. Client alleged that financial advisor misrepresented a variable life insurance policy as a private pension plan and further that his signature and initials on certain applications were forgeries. Customer alleged that a variable life insurance policy offered and sold was not a suitable investment recommendation. Customers alleged that variable life insurance policy sold to them were misrepresented to be private pension plans and that Daniel Burnett guaranteed a certain rate of tax-free return, and further that the actual return would be greater than the guaranteed rate or return. Moreover, customers alleged that the registered representative stated they would only have to pay the premiums until the age of 55 and thereafter, the policy would provide certain annual payments, tax-free for a source of retirement income. Daniel Brunette Red Flags & Your Rights As An Investor Of course, Daniel Brunette did not admit to any of the allegations. But regardless of whether an arbitration award was entered, a settlement occurred, or the customer complaint is still pending, the allegations made by customers are red flags which should put all current and former customers of Daniel Brunette at First Allied Securities, Inc. on alert to review carefully the activity and performance of their accounts and question whether Daniel Brunette has engaged in any stockbroker misconduct that may have caused them investment losses. The large number of customer complaints at Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC also raises questions about its supervisory practices. If these red flags raise questions, call us and we will inform you of your rights as an investor. File A Claim To Recover Your Investment Losses At First Allied Securities, Inc. and Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC If you have questions about First Allied Securities, Inc., Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC, and/or Daniel Brunette and the management or performance of your accounts, please contact Attorney Pearce for a free initial consultation via email or Toll Free at 1-800-732-2889.

Continue Reading