Category: News & Articles

FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEYS WHO CAN HANDLE YOUR SECURITIES, COMMODITIES AND INVESTMENT PROBLEMS

The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. understands what is at stake in securities, commodities and investment law matters and constantly strives to secure the most favorable possible result. Mr. Pearce provides a complete review of your case and fully explains your legal options. The firm works to ensure that you have all of the information necessary to make a sound decision before any action is taken in your case.

For dedicated representation by a law firm with substantial experience in all kinds of securities, commodities and investment disputes, contact the firm by phone at 833-300-6983, toll free at 800-732-2889 or via e-mail. We may also be able to arrange a meeting with you at offices located in Boca Raton, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and West Palm Beach, Florida and elsewhere.

Aug 20, 2026

What is Financial Advisor Misconduct? Everything You Need to Know

Financial advisor misconduct is when a financial professional violates their legal and ethical obligations to act in your best interests.  It can involve unsuitable investment recommendations, excessive trading, unauthorized transactions, misrepresentation of products, or outright theft of client funds. These violations cause undue financial harm to investors who placed their trust and their savings in the hands of an advisor who was supposed to protect them. Misconduct in the financial advisory industry is more common than most people realize, and it affects investors at every income level and stage of life. When it happens, you may be entitled to compensation through FINRA arbitration or other legal channels, depending on the facts of your case. Here at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., we concentrate on cases involving financial advisor misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty, and related investment fraud claims.  With over 45 years of experience and more than $185 million recovered for our clients, we understand what it takes to hold advisors and their firms accountable.  In this guide, we will walk you through the most common types of misconduct, how widespread the problem is, how to check your advisor’s record, and what steps to take if you believe your advisor has acted against your interests. What is Financial Advisor Misconduct? Financial advisor misconduct can involve unethical or illegal behavior that violates the legal, regulatory, or professional obligations a financial professional owes to a client.  If you trusted someone with your retirement savings or your family’s financial future, you deserve to know what misconduct looks like and when your advisor has crossed the line. Misconduct can range from recommending unsuitable investments to outright theft of client funds, and it takes many forms depending on the advisor’s relationship with the brokerage firm and the type of accounts involved.  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) oversees almost 640,000 registered financial professionals who collectively manage trillions of dollars in investable assets across the finance and insurance sector. A landmark study from researchers at Stanford University and the University of Chicago, published in the Journal of Political Economy, was the first to document the economy-wide extent of misconduct among financial advisers in the United States.  The researchers studied financial advisers in the United States between 2005 and 2015, and their data represented about 10% of employment in the finance and insurance sector. What they found confirmed what many investors already suspected: misconduct is far more common than the industry has acknowledged. Common Types of Financial Advisor Misconduct The most frequent forms of advisor misconduct include: Unauthorized trading and the falsification of investment documents, including forging client signatures on transaction forms, give rise to customer disputes, FINRA complaints, and civil claims against both the advisor and the employing firm. How Common is Financial Advisor Misconduct? According to a prominent study published in the Journal of Political Economy (but originally from the National Bureau of Economic Research), about 7% of active financial advisers had a recorded history of misconduct, with the rate exceeding 15% at some of the largest advisory firms. The research also found: These findings suggest that misconduct can persist when advisers with prior records remain in the industry or move between firms. That’s why it’s important for investors to review an adviser’s professional history before entrusting them with their money. Why Misconduct Persists in the Financial Advisory Industry Misconduct persists because the labor market absorbs advisors with tainted records, and the commission structures used across the industry create direct incentives for recommending unsuitable products. Research from Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business found that investment funds maximize their profits by offering commissions to advisors who sell specialized, higher-risk products to clients.  These commissions reward advisors for prioritizing fund revenue over client-investment fit. The consequences for advisers who engage in misconduct can be surprisingly limited.  Advisers who lose their jobs after regulatory action can find work at other firms, especially firms willing to hire people with prior misconduct records. Those firms also face few consequences for repeatedly hiring advisers with a history of violations, which can make it easier for the cycle to continue. We understand how frustrating it is to learn that the system designed to protect you has structural weaknesses. When regulators improve their detection capabilities, funds respond by raising commission payouts to offset the increased risk of getting caught.  Unethical advisors adapt as well, building clean reputations early in their careers and then increasing misconduct in later years when the reputational cost of getting caught has less impact on their accumulated earnings. Which Firms and Counties Have the Most Misconduct Some of the largest advisory firms in the United States have misconduct rates that are five to twenty times higher than firms with a clean reputation, and the concentration follows clear geographic and demographic patterns. The Stigler Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business publishes the Market for Financial Advisor Misconduct Index (chicagobooth.edu/research/stigler), which ranks firms, counties, and states by the percentage of advisors with misconduct disclosures. The underlying data is available for public download and provides an independent way to evaluate the track record of any firm you are considering.  The research shows that misconduct concentrates at firms serving retail customers and in counties with lower education levels, elderly populations, and higher incomes. The findings are consistent with some firms catering to unsophisticated consumers who lack the resources to vet their advisors. By contrast, firms with cleaner records tend to serve clients who are better equipped to evaluate financial professionals. First Allied Securities and Oppenheimer had misconduct rates of nearly 18% or higher, while Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs were closer to 1%.  How to Check a Financial Advisor’s Misconduct Record FINRA BrokerCheck is the primary tool available to the public for reviewing an advisor’s professional history, including customer disputes, regulatory actions, employment terminations, and criminal disclosures. You can search by the advisor’s name or their CRD number at the FINRA BrokerCheck portal. The full report gives you more detail than the summary, including information...

Keep Reading
Aug 20, 2026

What Is a Ponzi Scheme? Meaning, Madoff, & More

A Ponzi scheme is investment fraud that pays existing investors with money collected from new investors instead of profits from real business activity.  In a Ponzi Scheme, the fraudster pays out fake returns to early investors using money from new investors without making any real profit. It is named after Charles Ponzi, who ran a famous Ponzi scam in the 1920s. If you have been offered an investment promising consistent double-digit returns with no apparent downside, you have already encountered the standard pitch. The structure behind it does not change. In this guide, our investment fraud lawyer team will walk you through how Ponzi schemes work, how Ponzi scheme promoters operate, famous cases, and the red flags that can help you spot one. We’ll even give advice on how you could get your money back, depending on the circumstances.  What is a Ponzi Scheme? A Ponzi scheme is investment fraud that pays existing investors with money collected from new investors instead of profits from real business activity.  Unlike mutual funds and other legitimate investments, no trading, lending, or operating business generates the returns. Every payout pulls from the same pool of incoming deposits. The promoter typically promises high returns with little or no risk, describes the strategy as proprietary or too complex to explain in detail, and points to early investors’ returns as proof that the investment works. Those early returns are real payments, but they come from other investors’ deposits, not from market performance. The scheme collapses when new deposits are no longer enough to cover what the promoter owes existing investors. And that can happen when fewer people put money into the scheme or when existing investors cash out all at once. How Do Ponzi Schemes Work Ponzi schemes move through five stages. Each one depends on the stage before it, and the entire structure fails the moment any single stage breaks down. Here’s how a Ponzi scheme typically works: Signs of a Ponzi Scheme The clearest signs of a Ponzi scheme are returns that never vary, withdrawals getting harder over time, and no independent custodian. We will elaborate more on each of these signs below: Red Flags You Are Dealing With a Ponzi Scheme The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) has published a consistent set of red flags that appear in many Ponzi schemes regardless of the product or technology involved. They are as follows: Ponzi Scheme vs Pyramid Scheme The Ponzi scheme and a pyramid scheme take the money in different ways. A Ponzi scheme usually keeps the source of the payouts hidden from investors. In a pyramid scheme, participants are told that recruiting new members is how they earn money. If you invest in a Ponzi scheme, you believe you hold a position in a trading account, lending pool, or business venture. The operator issues statements showing exactly that, which is why early investors recommend the opportunity in good faith. They do not know how their returns are funded. Pyramid scheme members pay a fee to join and are promised payments for recruiting new participants, with the organizers taking all or a large percentage of each fee. Participants know from the beginning that recruiting others is how they earn money, even if they do not fully understand the risks involved. Both require a continuous supply of new participants and collapse when that supply thins. These two schemes also make people who joined last absorb nearly the entire loss. Famous Ponzi Schemes The two largest schemes in US history show how long the structure can run when the operator carries institutional credibility. Bernie Madoff Bernie Madoff ran the largest Ponzi scheme on record and reached $64.8 billion in claimed value across two decades. His firm operated as a legitimate market maker before the fraud began, giving the investment arm credibility that no outside promoter could manufacture. He described the strategy as a split-strike conversion, a method involving blue-chip stocks and options. The account records were built from historical trading data covering activity that never occurred. When the 2008 financial crisis produced withdrawal requests he could not cover, the operation collapsed within weeks. He received a 150-year sentence and died in prison in 2021. Allen Stanford You may not have heard of Allen Stanford, but his scheme defrauded investors of roughly $7 billion, making it the second-largest in US history. Stanford issued certificates of deposit through his offshore bank in Antigua. The CDs promised fixed rates well above what US banks offered, backed by a portfolio he described as conservative and diversified. But the investments were not what Stanford had represented them to be. Because of that, he received a 110-year sentence in 2012, and receivership recoveries have returned only a fraction of investor losses over the years since. You may not have heard of Allen Stanford, but his scheme defrauded investors of roughly $7 billion, making it the second-largest in US history. FINRA Arbitration for Victims of Ponzi Schemes You can file a FINRA arbitration claim when a registered broker sold you the investment, even if the brokerage firm never approved the product. Selling an unapproved investment is often referred to as selling away, a practice where a broker offers securities or investments outside the firm’s approved product list. FINRA Rule 3280 restricts these transactions unless the broker follows the required notice and approval procedures. A firm that fails to detect or stop selling away can be held liable for the resulting investor losses in FINRA arbitration, even though the investment never appeared on the firm’s books. The brokerage firm may also be held responsible for the losses. While the promoter may have little left to recover by the time the scheme collapses, the brokerage firm may have other resources available to satisfy a claim. It’s important to know that there are two limits that apply. FINRA arbitration generally requires a FINRA member firm or associated person subject to FINRA’s arbitration rules. And Rule 12206 makes a claim ineligible once six years have passed from the...

Keep Reading
Aug 19, 2026

Equity Linked Notes: How They Work, What They Pay, and What You Can Lose

An equity-linked note (ELN) is a short-to-medium-term financial instrument issued by banks and other institutions. A bank borrows your money and agrees to pay you back on a set date, but instead of paying you regular interest along the way, your return depends on how a stock, a basket of stocks, or a market index performs over the term.  With an equity-linked note, the bank splits your money between a bond that repays your principal and equity options that generate your upside. If the underlying rises, you collect a share of that gain. If it falls, what you get back depends entirely on the protection written into your terms, and plenty of these notes carry very little. As with all forms of investments, ELNs carry some risks. Take the time to understand what and where they come from to achieve better results.  Below, our team of investment fraud lawyers will walk you through what these notes are, how the participation rates, caps, and barriers actually determine your payout, and which risks can cost you your principal, so you can make the best investment decisions moving forward. What is an Equity-Linked Note? An equity-linked note, or ELN investment, is a debt instrument whose payout depends on the performance of a stock, a basket of stocks, or a market index rather than a fixed interest rate.  Banks and other financial institutions issue these notes with a set maturity date, and you collect your return on that date. When the note tracks an index, you may see it called an equity index-linked note. Most ELNs split into two pieces, with one portion that is often a zero-coupon bond sold below face value, and an equity option portion tied to the underlying. That second piece decides whether you earn anything above what you put in. If a broker sold you one of these as a safer alternative to stocks and you later discovered how much you had at risk, we understand how unsettling that is. How do Equity-Linked Notes Work? When a bank issues an equity-linked note, it spends part of your money on the bond component and the rest on equity options. If the issuer buys a zero-coupon bond large enough to repay your full principal at maturity, the note is called principal-protected, and you recover your original investment even when the underlying falls. Check the note’s terms to see whether principal protection applies. Plenty of issuers skip it. Instead, they offer a participation rate, which determines how much of the underlying’s gain passes through to the investor.  Say the participation rate is 80% and the index rises 10% over the term. The investor receives the original principal plus 8%, and the bank that sold the note keeps the remaining 2%. Of course, there is a tradeoff, and it falls on your principal. When the underlying loses value, and your note carries no protection, that decline comes straight out of your investment. Participation Rates, Caps, and Leverage The participation rate sets your share of the gain from the underlying stock or market index, and the cost of structuring and managing the note usually pulls that rate below 100%.  At a 75% participation rate, a 5% gain in the underlying earns you only 3.75%. A cap works in the opposite direction by putting a ceiling on your return, so once the underlying climbs past that level, additional gains stop reaching you. There is one more term you should look for. Some notes apply leverage, sometimes called gearing, which multiplies your exposure to the underlying’s movement. If your note has 150% upside gearing, a 10% gain in the underlying becomes a 15% return. Some notes also calculate returns using the average index level on several observation dates and not a single closing value. But if the index jumps near the end of the term, the late gain may not be fully reflected in your return. Equity-Linked Note Example Let’s walk one note through three markets so you can see how this plays out. Consider a $50,000 note with a two-year term, linked to the S&P 500, carrying a 120% participation rate, a 20% cap, and protection that holds only if the index closes at or above 85% of its starting level. Bull Market The index gains 15% over the two years. Your 120% participation rate turns that into an 18% return, which comes in under the cap, so you receive $59,000 at maturity. Had the index gained 25% instead, the cap would have limited your return to 20%, and the issuer would have kept the extra performance. Bear Market The index drops 25% and breaks the 85% barrier, so protection no longer applies and your principal absorbs the decline. You receive $37,500 back on a $50,000 investment. That same barrier did nothing for you in the good scenario, and here it is what costs you. Partial protection is not a guarantee, and the worst case usually appears deep in the offering documents. You may be feeling that nobody walked you through this outcome before you signed. Flat Market The index finishes where it started, and the underlying equity remains unchanged over the investment period. So, there is no gain to convert, and you receive your $50,000 back. Your statement may show no loss, but you also missed two years of dividends and the chance to earn a return. What Are the Benefits of Equity-Linked Notes? A broker likely sold you on the four points below, and each holds up under the right conditions. Higher Return Potential Linking returns to equities lets an ELN pay more than a conventional bond of similar length. That upside comes from the equity option component rather than from any coupon, which means it rises with your participation rate and shrinks under a cap. Principal Protection Principal protection means the issuer commits to returning your initial investment at maturity, funded by the zero-coupon bond inside the structure. Notes built this way are sold as principal-protected notes. Pull your own paperwork and...

Keep Reading
Aug 19, 2026

FINRA Series 65 vs. Series 7: What’s the Difference 

The Series 7 licenses a person to sell securities for a commission, while the Series 65 licenses a person to advise clients for a fee. Take the Series 7 if you want to work at a broker-dealer and earn commissions on the stocks, bonds, options, and funds you place for clients. Take the Series 65 if you want to work at a registered investment adviser, charge fees for your advice, and owe a fiduciary duty to the people you serve. The investment fraud lawyer team at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. has spent 45 years representing investors in claims involving both, and we see how often the license behind a recommendation shapes the claim that follows it.  In this guide, we explain the key differences between the Series 65 and Series 7. We’ll cover what each exam authorizes, how hard each one is to pass, the other FINRA and NASAA exams you may see on a registration record, what happens when someone holds both, and how to check any of it yourself. What Is the Difference Between the Series 65 and the Series 7? The Series 65 and the Series 7 are securities licensing exams that authorize separate jobs. Your financial professional’s license affects the fees and the legal standard they follow when giving you advice.  The Series 65, known as the Uniform Investment Adviser Law Exam, qualifies a person to register as an investment adviser representative, or IAR, and charge clients a fee for ongoing advice. The Series 7, or the General Securities Representative Qualification Examination, allows a person to work as a registered representative of a broker-dealer and earn commissions on the securities they sell. One person is paid for advice while the other is paid for transactions.  You may also see the Series 65 referred to as a FINRA exam, but that’s not technically correct. The Series 65 belongs to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), and FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, only administers it on NASAA’s behalf, while the Series 7 is FINRA’s own exam. What Can Each License Holder Do? A Series 7 holder recommends and executes securities transactions for a commission, and a Series 65 holder gives continuing investment advice for a fee. Each license permits different activities. With a Series 7, a registered representative can sell you stocks, bonds, options, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other investment company products. The firm earns a commission each time you transact.  The recommendations provided are governed by Regulation Best Interest, the SEC rule requiring a broker to act in your best interest at the time a recommendation is made. A Series 65 holder registers as an IAR of a registered investment adviser, or RIA, and is paid a flat fee, an hourly rate, or a percentage of the assets under management for portfolio management and ongoing investment advice. That person owes you a fiduciary duty under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which is an ongoing obligation. Note on Investment Fraud: If something goes wrong, this distinction might affect your claim. A broker who put you into an unsuitable product is answering for a specific recommendation, while an adviser who let a portfolio drift against your stated goals is answering for an entire relationship. How Hard is Each Exam? Each exam focuses on different responsibilities, but both require serious preparation. The Series 7 runs 125 scored questions over 225 minutes, requires 90 correct answers to pass, and costs $395 as of 2026 after FINRA raised the fee from $300. A candidate also needs the Securities Industry Essentials exam as a co-requisite and a FINRA member firm to file a Form U4 opening the testing window, which in practice means no job offer, no Series 7. The Series 65 runs 130 scored questions plus 10 unscored pretest items over 180 minutes, requires 92 correct answers, and costs $187. No sponsor is needed, so anyone can open an enrollment window through FINRA and sit for it, which is why career changers often take it first. In some cases, someone holding an active CFP, CFA, ChFC, PFS, or CIC designation can request a waiver of the Series 65 in most states. So, your adviser may be registered as an IAR without ever having sat the exam at all. Other FINRA or NASAA Exams Two exam numbers rarely describe a securities professional’s full registration history. Most people who sell or advise on investments hold a stack of qualifications, and the other numbers on that stack tell you what else the person is permitted to do. Each one covers a narrower slice of activity, and either FINRA or NASAA owns each. When you pull a registration record and see a column of exam codes, these are the four you are most likely to find sitting alongside the Series 65 and the Series 7. SIE The Securities Industry Essentials exam is the entry-level FINRA exam covering products, markets, regulators, and prohibited practices.  It carries 75 scored questions, costs $100, and requires 70 percent to pass. Anyone can take it without sponsorship, but on its own it authorizes nothing at all. It is a co-requisite for the Series 6 and the Series 7, and passing it does not permit anyone to sell you a security. Series 6 The Series 6 is a limited FINRA representative license covering investment company and variable contract products. A holder can sell mutual funds, variable annuities, variable life insurance, and unit investment trusts, and nothing beyond them.  It’s common among bank and insurance channel representatives, and it pairs with the SIE the same way the Series 7 does. But a representative with only a Series 6 license is not authorized to sell individual stocks.   Series 63 The Series 63 is NASAA’s Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination, and it registers a person as a securities agent within a state. It runs 60 scored questions, requires 43 correct answers, and costs $147.  The content is state law, prohibited practices, and the authority of...

Keep Reading
Jul 31, 2026

Citigroup Global Markets Broker Elijah Goble Under Investigation For Unsuitable Barrier Note and Improper Handling of Customer Account FINRA Complaints

Our firm is investigating Citigroup Global Markets Inc. broker and financial advisor Elijah Grant Goble (CRD# 6760147) of Costa Mesa, California for potential investment-related misconduct arising from customer complaints alleging an unsuitable coupon barrier note recommendation and improper handling of a municipal debt account. Elijah Grant Goble’s Financial Advisor Career History According to his FINRA BrokerCheck report, Elijah Grant Goble has been registered in the securities industry since 2017 and is currently licensed in numerous states and with multiple self-regulatory organizations. He is presently registered as a General Securities Representative and investment adviser representative with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CRD# 7059), working through Citi Retail Banking branch offices in Costa Mesa, California, and affiliated locations. He has been with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. since March 26, 2018. Goble’s prior investment-related employment includes: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. in Irvine, California, where he was employed as a financial advisor from February 2017 through March 2018 and registered with the firm from April 2017 through March 2018. Bank of America, N.A. in Irvine, California, where he served as a financial advisor from August 2017 to March 2018.

Keep Reading
Jul 30, 2026

Realta Equities and Realta Investment Advisors Broker Ashley Romiti Under Investigation For Unsuitable DST and Real Estate Securities Recommendations FINRA Complaint

Ashley Quinn Romiti (CRD# 7636987). Our firm is investigating Realta Equities, Inc. broker and Realta Investment Advisors, Inc. investment adviser representative Ashley Quinn Romiti of San Juan Capistrano, California for potential investment-related misconduct involving allegedly unsuitable recommendations in Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) and other real estate securities. Financial Advisor’s Career History According to her FINRA BrokerCheck report, Ashley Quinn Romiti is currently registered as a General Securities Representative with Realta Equities, Inc. and as an investment adviser representative with Realta Investment Advisors, Inc. She has been registered with both firms since March 3, 2025, working primarily out of San Juan Capistrano, California, while also listing a Wilmington, Delaware office address. Romiti has passed the Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam, the Series 7TO General Securities Representative Examination, and the Series 66 Uniform Combined State Law Examination. She is licensed in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Before joining Realta Equities and Realta Investment Advisors, Romiti was registered with Arkadios Capital (broker) and Arkadios Wealth Advisors (investment adviser) from July/August 2023 through March 2025. Prior to that, she was associated with Emerson Equity LLC as both a broker and investment adviser from November 2022 through November 2023, based in Irvine and San Mateo, California. Her employment history also includes investment-related business development roles at Perch Wealth, Verada, and Topside Real Estate, as well as non-investment-related positions in business development and case management

Keep Reading
Jul 28, 2026

What the Series 79 Exam Is and How to Pass It?

The Series 79 exam is the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) qualification exam for Investment Banking Representatives. If you are preparing to take one of the securities industry’s licensing exams, you probably want clear answers about what it covers, what it costs, and how hard it is to pass. This guide provides detailed information about the exam format, the three tested functions, the requirements, and what to do if you fall short, so you know exactly what to expect before test day. What Is the Series 79 Exam? Passing the Series 79, together with the Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) Exam and sponsorship by a FINRA member firm, qualifies an individual for registration as an Investment Banking Representative under FINRA. It qualifies representatives to advise on and help arrange securities transactions in the capital markets, which covers much of the everyday work that analysts and associates perform on live deals. FINRA administers the exam as a specialized alternative to the broader Series 7, so your training stays focused on deal work rather than retail sales. Once you pass, you register as an Investment Banking Representative under FINRA Rule 1220, which formally recognizes your ability to perform these functions. We understand the exam can feel intimidating when you are just starting your career in the financial industry, and you may be feeling unsure about how much ground it covers. The requirements and knowledge required become much clearer once you break the exam into its parts, which is what the rest of this guide does. What Does the Series 79 License Let You Do? The Series 79 permits registered representatives in the Investment Banking Representative category to advise companies on certain investment banking transactions Companies rely on qualified financial professionals, particularly investment banking professionals, for advice on complex financial transactions and corporate restructuring. Those recommendations may include how to go about making a tender offer to purchase shareholders’ stock, or how to reorganize a company’s debt and capital during distress (financial restructuring). Aside from those two examples, the recommendation may also include mergers, acquisitions, or asset sales. It’s also important to note that carrying this registration has firm boundaries. While it authorizes certain securities activities related to investment banking, it does not permit you to solicit or market securities directly to investors. Representatives who want to actively market securities to investors generally must also hold the Series 7 registration, which qualifies them for general securities representative registration under FINRA. What Is the Series 79 Exam Format? The Series 79 exam contains 75 scored multiple-choice questions, and you have two hours and thirty minutes to complete it. To pass, you must achieve a scaled score equivalent to 73%. On the current exam, this corresponds to answering approximately 55 of the 75 scored questions correctly. Every question presents four answer choices, and the entire exam is delivered by computer at a testing center or through online proctoring. You may also see ten additional questions that do not count toward your score. These unscored questions allow FINRA to evaluate new exam items before they are used with future test takers. They appear at random and look identical to scored questions, so you should treat every question as though it counts. That approach keeps you from second-guessing which topics are scored and which are being trialed. What Topics Are on the Series 79 Exam? The Series 79 organizes its questions around three investment banking functions defined by FINRA, and each function carries a different weight on the exam. They are: These functions mirror the actual work that entry-level investment bankers perform, from analyzing financial data to executing offerings and advising on deals. Understanding how the questions are distributed helps you identify the knowledge needed for each function and prioritize your study time accordingly. The three major job functions below account for the entire scored portion of the exam, so we will look at each one in turn. Data collection and evaluation Data collection, analysis, and evaluation make up the largest function on the exam, accounting for 49 percent of the questions. This section centers on financial statements and valuation, which are the analytical foundation of nearly every banking assignment. You will be tested on reading disclosures, interpreting SEC filings and prospectuses, and building the due diligence frameworks that support a recommendation. A prospectus is the formal document that discloses the details of a securities offering to potential investors. Expect a fair amount of valuation math as well, since this function rewards candidates who can work the numbers under time pressure. You may need to calculate a company’s equity value and enterprise value, adjust for non-recurring items, or estimate an IPO valuation using earnings or revenue multiples, depending on the company and industry. These calculations reflect the daily work of a junior banker, so the exam tests them in applied scenarios rather than as abstract formulas. Underwriting and offerings The second function covers underwriting, new financing, and the registration of securities, and it makes up 27 percent of the scored questions. Underwriting is the process by which a bank helps a company raise capital by issuing and distributing new securities to investors. Capital raising transactions may involve equity offerings, debt offerings, or other financing structures. You must understand the roles of the underwriters, the SEC filings that accompany an offering, and the exemptions that let certain deals proceed without full registration. This section also reaches into the mechanics that govern how offerings actually reach the market. You will see questions on shelf registration, private placements (private securities offerings), and the rules that control marketing materials during a deal. A private placement is the sale of securities to a limited group of investors without a public offering, and it follows a different set of regulatory steps. This function measures which process applies to which type of deal. Mergers, acquisitions, and restructuring Mergers and acquisitions, tender offers, and financial restructuring form the third function, and at 24 percent, it is the smallest of the three by weight. Even so, it...

Keep Reading
Jul 28, 2026

FINRA Rule 3280: Private Securities Transactions

FINRA Rule 3280 treats a single introduction the same as a completed sale. You do not have to buy or sell a security yourself to violate it, which is where many brokers get caught off guard. The rule governs how associated persons of FINRA member firms handle private securities transactions, the conduct often called selling away. It requires written notice, firm approval, and firm supervision. Breaking it can lead to fines, suspensions, or a permanent bar from the industry. Our investment fraud lawyers break down what the rule requires and what it means for investors who lost money to an unauthorized deal. What Is FINRA Rule 3280? FINRA Rule 3280 governs how associated persons of a FINRA member firm take part in private securities transactions that fall outside their normal job duties. Before you participate in any way, the rule requires prior written notice to your firm. The firm then decides whether to approve, and if it does, it must supervise and record the transaction. The written notice has to describe the proposed transaction in detail, explain your role, and state whether you have received or expect to receive any selling compensation. If the firm approves, it supervises and records the deal as if the firm had executed it. FINRA 3280 casts a wide net. Most associated persons underestimate how broadly FINRA reads the phrase “participate in any manner.” You do not have to buy or sell securities to trigger the rule. FINRA counts referrals, introductions, and forwarding offering materials as participation. That holds whether or not you are paid for it. If you are unsure whether your involvement rises to that level, assume that it does. One more distinction matters. FINRA Rule 3270 applies only to registered persons, such as registered representatives, while FINRA Rule 3280 reaches both registered and non-registered associated persons of a FINRA member firm. In practice, an unregistered associated person can trip the rule just as fast as a licensed one. What Counts as a Private Securities Transaction? A private securities transaction is any securities transaction that happens outside the regular course or scope of your employment with a member firm. Common examples include new offerings that are not registered with the SEC, private placements, and investments in startups or real estate ventures your firm does not offer or supervise. FINRA often calls this kind of deal an outside securities transaction, because it sits beyond the firm’s review. The products range widely. They can include non-traded real estate investment trusts, interests in private funds or other unregistered investment companies, and stakes in early-stage ventures. What ties them together is that they involve financial assets your firm never approved. Brokers get pulled into these deals by higher payouts or a personal tie to the sponsor, which is often when disclosure slips. The rule usually bites on these unregistered offerings, not the registered investment companies a firm already sells. Selling Compensation Selling compensation under Rule 3280 goes well beyond a standard commission. It covers any payment or benefit you receive in connection with a private securities transaction. That includes finder’s fees, securities or the right to acquire them, and profit-sharing interests. It also reaches tax benefits and expense reimbursements tied to the deal. Whether selling compensation is involved decides which approval path applies. If you will be paid, your firm must approve or disapprove your participation in writing. If no compensation changes hands, the firm still has to acknowledge your notice and may attach conditions to your involvement. How Does Rule 3280 Apply to Associated Persons and Member Firms? FINRA Rule 3280 puts duties on both sides of private securities transactions (PSTs). For associated persons, the core duty is disclosure. You have to tell your firm about every private securities transaction before you take part. For member firms, the core duty is oversight. The rule frames that oversight as a set of supervisory and recordkeeping obligations, so any approved transaction goes on the firm’s books and gets watched like the firm’s own business. Written Notice Requirements Your written notice must describe the proposed transaction in detail, spell out your role, and state whether you have received or may receive selling compensation. When a series of related transactions involves no selling compensation, you can file a single notice for the whole series instead of one for each deal. Timing is not flexible. The notice has to come before your participation starts. You must have provided prior written notice before you lift a finger. If you provide written notice only after the fact, or at the same time, it does not satisfy the rule. The safest habit is to file the moment a deal is on the table, well before any money or paperwork moves. A late notice is treated the same as no notice at all. Firm Approval and Supervision When selling compensation is involved, your firm has to answer your notice in writing, either approving or disapproving your participation. That written sign-off is the firm’s prior written approval of the associated person’s participation. If it approves, the firm records the transaction on its books and supervises it as if the firm had executed it. Once cleared, approved transactions live on the firm’s books and stay under firm supervision. In practice, that puts the deal under the same compliance and oversight the firm applies to any transaction it runs. When no selling compensation is involved, the firm still owes you prompt written acknowledgment of your notice. It can also set specific conditions on your participation if it chooses. What Is the Difference Between FINRA Rule 3280 and Rule 3270? FINRA Rule 3280 and FINRA Rule 3270 cover related but separate conduct. FINRA Rule 3280 governs private securities transactions that an associated person conducts outside the firm. FINRA Rule 3270 applies more broadly to a registered person’s outside business activities, meaning almost any outside work or role, whether or not it touches securities. For a financial advisor, that sweeps in a wide range of business activities. The disclosure triggers...

Keep Reading
Jul 28, 2026

What Are Junk Bonds?

Junk bonds are corporate bonds rated below investment grade that pay higher yields in exchange for a higher risk of default. If you invested in high yield bonds and suffered losses you were never warned about, you are not alone. Learning that your broker may not have had your best interests in mind is hard to sit with. At the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., we represent investors harmed by unsuitable investments and undisclosed risks. Our cases involve broker misconduct with junk bonds and other speculative investments. Junk bonds are not automatically improper investments. The question is whether the broker who recommended them understood your risk tolerance and told you the truth about what you were buying. What Are Junk Bonds? Junk bonds are corporate bonds carrying a credit rating below investment grade. The companies behind them have a higher likelihood of failing to repay what they owe. You may also hear junk bonds called high yield bonds or speculative grade debt. Companies issue these debt instruments when they need to borrow money but cannot earn better credit ratings from the agencies grading corporate creditworthiness. That profile pushes them below the investment grade line. Junk bonds offer something in exchange for that weakness. To attract investors willing to accept a higher risk of default, they pay higher interest rates than investment grade debt. Those higher interest payments exist for one reason. There is a real chance you never get your principal amount back at maturity. How Do Junk Bonds Work? Junk bonds work the same way most bonds do. You lend money to a company. The company agrees to pay interest on a set schedule and repay debt in full at maturity. What changes is the credit quality behind that promise. Companies issuing junk bonds carry weaker balance sheets, thinner cash flow, or heavier debt loads than stable companies with investment grade ratings. Their ability to meet financial obligations is less certain, and credit ratings are the shorthand the market uses for that gap. Lower credit ratings mean a higher risk of default. The market charges for that risk, and the charge shows up as higher yields. Junk bonds carry coupons above what investment grade bonds pay. None of that extra income is free. Higher yields compensate investors for a higher risk of default, and the junk bond market reprices that risk daily. How Are Junk Bonds Rated? Credit rating agencies grade an issuer on how likely it is to make scheduled interest payments and return principal at maturity. The dividing line sits at BBB- from S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings, or Baa3 from Moody’s. At or above that line is investment grade. Below it is junk. Eleven credit rating agencies are currently registered with the SEC as nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Three of these credit agencies dominate corporate bond ratings in the United States: Below the investment grade line, the scale keeps sorting risk: A rating is an opinion about credit risk, not a promise. Rating agencies can raise or lower credit ratings at any point. What Do Credit Ratings Mean for Investors? Bonds with better credit ratings trade at higher prices and pay lower yields, because the market sees the issuer as more likely to pay on time. Bonds with lower credit ratings trade at discounted prices and carry higher yields to compensate investors for the added uncertainty. A change in credit ratings moves the value of your investment fast. Rating agencies review an issuer’s revenue, debt levels, and financial condition continuously. A single downgrade can trigger forced selling by pension funds and other institutional investors restricted to investment grade securities, which pushes bond prices down for everyone holding the same issue. Junk Bonds vs. Investment Grade Bonds Both sit inside the fixed income sleeve of a portfolio, which is where the confusion starts. The difference is credit quality. Investment grade bonds come from stable companies and governments that rating agencies view as highly likely to meet their financial obligations. They pay lower yields because buyers accept less income for a smaller risk of default. Most bonds in a conservative retirement account sit in this asset class. Junk bonds sit on the other side of the line. They deliver higher yields than their investment grade counterparts, their prices move more sharply, and they carry a higher risk of default that can take your principal with it. Treating the two as interchangeable because both are called bonds is a mistake a broker is paid to prevent. What Are the Pros of Junk Bonds? Junk bonds exist because some investors want more income than investment grade debt pays. Three things attract investors to this asset class: That last point comes with a caution. According to FINRA, high yield bonds tend to move in the same direction as stocks. An investor trying to balance a stock-heavy portfolio may not get the diversification they expect from this corner of the fixed income market. What Are the Cons of Junk Bonds? Higher yields always sit on top of higher risk, and one common assumption about junk bonds runs backwards. A fixed income allocation built on junk bonds is not the conservative sleeve most investors assume it is. How Do Investors Buy Junk Bonds? Buying junk bonds directly means purchasing individual junk bonds through a brokerage account. According to FINRA, par value is typically $1,000 per bond. Most corporate bonds require a minimum investment of that amount. Many junk bond investors reach the high yield market through mutual funds and exchange traded funds instead. These funds hold portfolios spanning dozens or hundreds of issuers, which limits the damage any single default can do. Mutual funds also give smaller investors exposure they could not build alone. The choice between buying junk bonds directly and investing in junk bonds through a fund comes down to your experience, your research access, and your tolerance for concentration risk. Either path puts you in speculative grade securities. If you are a risk averse investor, or...

Keep Reading
Jul 28, 2026

PHX Financial Broker Alex Ng Under Investigation For Unsuitable Investments and Misrepresentation FINRA Complaint

Alex Ng (CRD# 5842211) is a PHX Financial, Inc. stockbroker and investment adviser representative based in New York, New York, who is currently the subject of multiple pending FINRA customer disputes involving allegedly unsuitable investments and misrepresentation. Stockbroker Alex Ng’s Career History Alex Ng has spent his entire securities career in the New York market with a small number of brokerage and advisory firms: August 2010 – June 2022: Registered Representative, National Securities Corporation (New York, NY). March 2019 – May 2022: Investment Adviser Representative, National Asset Management (New York, NY). May 2022 – Present: Registered Representative, PHX Financial, Inc. (New York, NY). He is currently registered as a General Securities Representative with FINRA and licensed as a securities agent in more than 40 U.S. states and territories.

Keep Reading
1 2 3 … 52