Our firm is investigating LPL Financial LLC advisor and registered representative David Robert McCain (CRD# 2039283) of Johnson City, Tennessee for potential investment-related misconduct.
Financial Advisor’s Career History
Based on the broker’s registration history, David R. McCain has worked in the securities industry since at least 1990 and has been registered with multiple firms over his career, including: J.C. Bradford & Co. (05/1990–08/2000); UBS Financial Services Inc. (08/2000–09/2007); Commonwealth Financial Network (08/2007–09/2009); Woodbury Financial Services, Inc. (09/2009–01/2024); Osaic Wealth, Inc. (01/2024–08/2024); and LPL Financial LLC (since 08/19/2024).
David Robert McCain Fraud Allegations and Investor Complaints Explained
FINRA BrokerCheck reflects two customer dispute disclosures for Mr. McCain—one dismissed and one pending—including allegations tied to unsuitable recommendations and a separate matter alleging a failure to provide information/requested account statements.
Disclosure Snapshot (for context)
- Customer Dispute (Arbitration) — Dismissed (07/13/2003): Customers alleged that since 1991 the purchase of a variable annuity, UITs, and tech stocks was unsuitable; alleged damages $350,000; NASD Docket 02-01585; broker statement notes he “was dismissed as a respondent prior to settlement.”
- Customer Dispute (Civil Litigation) — Pending (as of 12/16/2025): Customer alleges the representative failed to provide information and requested statements for her account(s); alleged damages $2,000,000; filed in State of Tennessee, Hamblen County Chancery Court (Docket 32CH1-2025-CV-347) with filing date 11/12/2025; broker denies wrongdoing and asserts the claimant was not his customer.
2002–2003 NASD Arbitration Alleging Unsuitable Recommendations (Dismissed)
FINRA BrokerCheck reports that a complaint was received on 05/02/2002 while Mr. McCain was associated with UBS PaineWebber Inc. The customers alleged that purchases of a variable annuity, unit investment trusts (UITs), and tech stocks were unsuitable, claiming $350,000 in damages. The matter was filed as NASD Docket #02-01585 and shows a dismissal dated 07/13/2003.
2025 Tennessee Chancery Court Matter Alleging Failure to Provide Information/Statements (Pending)
A separate disclosure reflects a pending customer dispute received 12/16/2025. The customer alleges the representative failed to provide information and requested statements for her account(s), with alleged damages of $2,000,000. The disclosure indicates the matter is in the State of Tennessee, Hamblen County Chancery Court, Docket 32CH1-2025-CV-347, with a filing date of 11/12/2025. Mr. McCain denies wrongdoing and states the allegations are without merit, asserting the claimant was not his customer.
To the extent the facts ultimately support these allegations, disputes like these can raise issues about whether an advisor complied with suitability obligations (when recommending products such as variable annuities or UITs) and whether appropriate client communications, documentation, and responsiveness were maintained when account information was requested.
To obtain a copy of David Robert McCain’s FINRA BrokerCheck report, visit this link.
Robert Wayne Pearce Is Committed to Recovering Your Investment Losses
FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability) is frequently implicated when an investor alleges that a recommended product or strategy—such as a variable annuity, UITs, or concentrated sector equities—was not appropriate for the customer’s financial profile. In a dispute like the one alleging unsuitable purchases (variable annuity/UITs/tech stocks), a suitability analysis typically examines whether the recommendation aligned with the investor’s stated objectives and risk tolerance, whether material risks and costs were explained, and whether the overall strategy was reasonable in light of the customer’s circumstances.
FINRA Rule 2090 (Know Your Customer) and related account documentation expectations often become important when a dispute turns on what the advisor knew (or should have known) about the investor’s financial situation, investment objectives, liquidity needs, and risk constraints at the time recommendations were made. In the context of an alleged suitability matter, these principles can be central to evaluating whether the advisor gathered and maintained adequate customer profile information to support the recommendation.
FINRA Rule 4511 (Books and Records) and FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade) are commonly analyzed when a complaint alleges inadequate information flow, missing records, or failures to provide requested account statements and information. In a matter alleging a failure to provide information and requested statements, key questions can include whether required records were maintained, whether communications were handled in a manner consistent with industry standards, and whether conduct reflected the ethical and professional obligations expected of registered persons.
The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. is a nationally recognized securities law firm representing investors in FINRA arbitration and securities fraud cases on a contingency fee basis. Robert Wayne Pearce, the founding attorney, has more than 45 years of experience recovering millions for victims of broker misconduct and investment fraud. He previously defended major brokerage firms and now uses that insight to protect investors nationwide. To discuss your case directly with Mr. Pearce, call (800) 732-2889 or email pearce@rwpearce.com for a free consultation.
Rate this Post
Loading...